رویکرد رفتاری به شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل تعیین‌کننده پذیرش همکاری الکترونیک در دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.

2 استاد دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران.

چکیده

در سال­های اخیر همکاری الکترونیک به‌ عنوان یکی از استراتژی‌های جدید تعامل و رقابت در دستور کار سازمان‌ها به‌ویژه دانشگاه‌ها قرار گرفته است. هدف از انجام این پژوهش بررسی عوامل تعیین‌کننده پذیرش همکاری الکترونیک در دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان است. ماهیت تحقیق توصیفی- پیمایشی است و حجم نمونه مورد مطالعه 102 نفر است که به روش نمونه‌گیری قضاوتی هدفمند انتخاب شده­اند. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌های پرسشنامه از آزمون­های t، همبستگی پیرسون، فریدمن و رگرسیون چندمتغیره استفاده شده است. یافته‌های تحقیق نشان می­دهد که از میان عوامل مورد مطالعه، کنترل رفتاری درک شده بیشترین تأثیر و تصویر ذهنی کمترین تأثیر را بر پذیرش همکاری الکترونیک دارد. سایر عوامل اثرگذار بر پذیرش همکاری الکترونیک به ترتیب میزان اثرگذاری عبارتند از: وضعیت منابع تسهیل‌کننده، مزیت نسبی، سهولت استفاده درک‌شده، اعتماد، تسهیم اطلاعات، سودمندی درک‌شده، خودکارآمدی، قابلیت سازگاری درک‌شده و پیچیدگی. انتظار می‌رود جامعه مورد مطالعه این پژوهش با اتخاذ راهبردهای مناسب رفتاری امکان پذیرش بیشتر و توسعه همکاری‌های الکترونیک را فراهم آورند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Behavioral Approach to Identifying and Ranking the Determinants of the Acceptance of Electronic Collaboration at University of Sistan and Baluchestan

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Effati 1
  • Noor Mohammad Yaghoobi 2
1 Master in IT management, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran.
2 Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

In recent years, electronic collaboration has become one of the new strategies for interaction and competition in the agenda of organizations, specifically universities. The purpose of this research is to investigate the factors determining the acceptance of electronic collaboration at University of Sistan and Baluchestan. This study is a descriptive survey, the sampling method was purposive judgmental, and the data of questionnaire is analyzed through One-Sample T-test, Pearson Correlation, Freidman Ranking, and also Stepwise Multiple Regression by using SPSS. Findings of the research show that among the studied factors, perceived behavioral control has the greatest impact and mental image has the least effect on the acceptance of electronic collaboration. Other factors influencing the acceptance of electronic collaboration, prioritized based on their effectiveness, are: status of facilitating resources, relative advantage, perceived ease of use, trust, information sharing, perceived usefulness, self-efficacy, perceived compatibility and complexity. It’s expected that the population of this study will make it possible to adopt and develop electronic collaboration by implementing appropriate behavioral strategies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • technology acceptance
  • university
  • Electronic Collaboration
  • Electronics Collaboration Technologies

زاهدی، شمس السادات، خانباشی، محمد، رضایی، الهام (1390). افزایش اعتماد عمومی بر پایه ارتقای فرهنگ پاسخگویی، پژوهش‌نامه مدیریت اجرایی. سال 3. شماره 5. 94 – 69.

Bhatti, T. (2007). Exploring factors influencing the adoption of mobile commerce. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(3), 1-13.

Bidgoli, H. (2012). E-collaboration: new productivity tool forthe twenty-first century and beyond. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 13(4), 147-153.

Bititci, U., Van Der Meer, R., & Noordin, N. (2012). The adoption of E-collaboration technology in decision-making process and development of inter-organizational trust: A case study in service supply chain. In: 4th World Conference on Production & Operations Management, Amsterdam. 1-10.

Burgess. L., & Jones, M. L. (2010). The mechanics of e-collaboration and why it works- An empirical assessment of Australian SMEs., In H. Yeatman (Eds.), The SInet 2010 eBook, 13-24, available at:  https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1822&context=commpapers. (14/02/2018).

Cai, G., & Kock, N. (2009). An evolutionary game theoretic perspective on e-collaboration: The collaboration effort and media relativeness. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(3), 821-833.

Chan, F., Chong, A. Y., & Zhou, L (2012). An empirical investigation of factors affecting e-collaborationdiffusion in SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 329-344.

Charri, W., Chebil. R., & Cerri. S. A. (2010). Performance evaluation of e-collaboration. IADIS'10: International Conference on Collaborative Technologies, Fribourg: Germany.

Chebil, E., Chaari, L., & Cerri, M. (2011). An e-collaboration new vision and its effects on performance evaluation. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications. 3(2), 560 -567.

Chong, A. Y., Ooi, K., & Soha, L. A. (2009). The relationship between supply chain factors and adoption of e-collaboration tools: An empirical examination. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 150-160.

Chong, A., Ooi, K., Lin, B., & Raman. M, (2009). Factors affecting the adoption level of e-commerce: An emprical study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(2), 13-22.

Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. (2001). Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information Systems Research, 12(3), 304-321.

Co, O., & Choi. (2011). The impacts of electronic collaboration and information exploitation capability on firm performance: Focusing on suppliers using buyer-dominated, inter-organizational information systems. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 5(2), 1-17.

Dasgupta, S., Granger, M., & McGarry, N. (2002). User acceptance of e-collaboration technology: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Group Decision and Negotiation, 11(1), 87-100.

Frew, A., & Pringle, S. (1995). Multi-media marketing across ATM broadband networks – A hospitality and tourism perspective: Part one. The Hospitality Information Technology Association Worldwide Conference, New Orleans.

Goonatilake, R., Herath, S., Herath, A., & Tyska, C. (2009). E-collaboration issues in global trade, transactions, and practices. European Journal of Scientific Research, 34(3), 326-336.

Kock, N. (2009). A comparative analysis of e-collaboration research funding in the european union and the United States. In Virtual Team Leadership and Collaborative Engineering Advancements: Contemporary Issues and Implications, 40-48, IGI Global.

Kock, N., & J. Nosek. (2005). Expanding the boundaries of e-collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(1), 1-9.

Kock. N., Ocker. R. D., & Wazlawick. R. (2001) E-collaboration: A look at past research and future challenges. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 5(1), 1-8.

Lefebvre, E., Lefebvre, L. A., Le Hen, G., & Mendgen, R. (2006). Cross-border e-collaboration for new product development in the automotive industry. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1-10.

Lin, J. Y., Guo, Z. L., & Lee, C. W. (2006). A panel study for the influential factors of the adoption of CRM system, International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 4(5), 410-418.

Mayrhofer, A., & Back, A. (2003). Workplace e-collaboration in practice identifying preconditions for successfully implementing e-collaboration in organizations. Information Technology & Organizations: Trends, Issues, Challenges & Solutions, 1(1), 409-413.

McDonnell, M. (2001). E-collaboration: Transforming your supply chain into a dynamic trading community. Supply Chain Practice, 3(1), 80-89.

Mele´ndez, A. P., Moreno, G., & Obra, A. (2008). Factors affecting e-collaboration technology use among management students. Computers & Education, 51(2), 609–623.

Mohammad Jafari, M., Ahmed, S., & Dawal, S. (2010). The relationship between broject management and e-collaboration. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Dhaka, Bangladesh. 1-6.

Noordin, F., & Sadi. M. (2011). Factors influencing the adoption of m-commerce: An exploratory analysis. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 492- 499.

Robyn, L., Hol, A., & Hall, T. (2007). Challenges of e-collaboration among SMEs. BLED 2007 Proceedings, 448-660. http://aisel.aisnet.org/bled­2007/14. (10/11/2017).

Shaharudin, M. R., Omar, M. W., Shamsul, J. E., Mahazir, I., Siti, M. A., & Mohd, I. F. (2012). Determinants of electronic commerce adoption in Malaysian SMEs’ furniture industry. African Journal of Business Management, 6(10), 3648-3661.

Sudhakar, S., & Sudharani, R. D. (2012). Adoption of CRM technologies among Indian SMEs- A review and suggested model, European Journal of Social Sciences, 28(4), 538-548.

Timothy, D. J. (2003). Supranationalist alliances and tourism: Insights from ASEAN and SAARC, Current Issues in Tourism, 6(3), 250-167.

Tshinakaho, R. S., & Kekwaletswe, R. M., (2012) Conceptualizing social presence awareness in e-collaboration of postgraduate students. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 9(3), 124-135.

Turel, O., & Connelly, C. (2011). Team spirit: The influence of psychological collectivism on the usage of e-collaboration tools. Group Decision and Negotiation, 21(5), 703–725.

Turel, O., & Zhang, Y. (2008), Contextualizing the adoption of electric collaboration tools: System and team considerations. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), 382(1), 1-8.