The Fate of Public Policies after Proclamation: An Analysis of the Interaction of Political Will and Administrative Capacity

Editor-in-Chief Lecture

Author

Professor at Public Administration Department, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

10.22034/jipas.2021.151301

Abstract

In general, four generations have the knowledge inventory of “public policy implementation”: the top-down, bottom-up, hybrid, and emerging generation -policy regime, enforcement science. In the light of the inspirations of these four generations, theoretical models have been developed based on various reference points about the “life of public policy implementation”. All knowledge in the study of public policy and public administration has been centered around the “great policy-administration dichotomy”. The author argues that the models of public policy implementation as well as the coordinates of public policy in four contingent approaches to implementation can be analyzed by relying on two original strategic reference points in policy and administrative knowledge (political will-administrative capacity).

Keywords


Brower, R., Bertrand Jones, T., Tandberg, D., Hu, S., & Park, T. (2017). Comprehensive developmental education reform in Florida: A policy implementation typology. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(6), 809-834.
Campanella, M. L. (1991). Proactive Policy-making: The New Role of the State-Actor. Government and Opposition, 26(4), 480-499.
Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145-174.
McConnell, A. (2020). The use of placebo policies to escape from policy traps. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(7), 957-976.
McConnell, A., & t Hart, P. (2019). Inaction and public policy: Understanding why policymakers ‘do nothing’. Policy Sciences, 52(4), 645-661.
Si, Y. (2020). Implementing targeted poverty alleviation: A policy implementation typology. Journal of Chinese Governance, 5(4), 439-454.