Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies

Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies

Regulatory Impact Assessment as an Instrument for Debugging in Statesmanship: Understanding the Rationale, the Implementation Process and the Challenges Ahead

Editor-in-Chief Lecture

Author
Professor at Public Administration Department, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jipas.2023.200347
Abstract
All public policies in governance scale, strategies in public administration, routines and procedures in operations need regulations for implementation. Although the law, policy, circulars, government decrees, and instructions all have a regulatory aspect, but in the literature of the state, regulations refer to the regulatory measures that the the government establish to implement the public policy. Evaluating the effectiveness of these regulators, whether applied in the public sector or for society is considered one of the important instruments of political and managerial decision-making in the political systems of different countries of the world. Regulatory impact assessment or regulatory effects analysis is a document that is compiled by the advisory groups of general policies in the government before the approval of a regulatory measure. Therefore, it can play an important role in debugging the past in the way the state works. The ultimate goal of this article is to understand what is, the importance and necessity of impact assessment, the stages of its implementation, and the challenges facing its implementation in the public sector of Iran.
Keywords

دانائی‌فرد، حسن. (1399). چارچوبی برای تحلیل کشورداری. مدیریت منابع سازمانی. سال 9 شماره 3، 175-187.
Anderson, J. (1984), Public policy-making: An introduction (3rd edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bozeman, B. (2002). Public‐value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review62(2), 145-161.
Carroll, P. (2010). Does regulatory impact assessment lead to better policy?. Policy and Society29(2), 113-122.
Clinton, W.J. (1993). Executive order 12866: Regulatory planning and review.” Federal Register. 58(190): 51735-51744. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg_regmatters
Dunlop, C. A., Maggetti, M., Radaelli, C. M., & Russel, D. (2012). The many uses of regulatory impact assessment: A meta‐analysis of EU and UK cases. Regulation & Governance6(1), 23-45.
Hahn, R. W. (1998). Government analysis of the benefits and costs of regulation. Available at SSRN 167048.
Hahn, Robert W. & John Hird .(1991). The Costs and Benefits of Regulation: Review and Synthesis,‖ Yale Journal on Regulation, 8, pp. 233-278.
Hahn, R. W., & Litan, R. E. (2005). Counting regulatory benefits and costs: lessons for the US and Europe. Journal of International Economic Law8(2), 473-508.
Haines, F. (2009). Regulatory failures and regulatory solutions: A characteristic analysis of the aftermath of disaster. Law & Social Inquiry34(1), 31-60.
Jacobzone, Stéphane, Faye Steiner, Erika L. Ponton, & Emmanuel Job (2010).Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Management Sytems: Preliminary Statistical and Econometric Estimates‖, OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 17, OECD Publishing, dx.doi:10.1787/5kmfq1pch36h-en.
Jacobzone, S., C. Choi & C. Miguet (2007).Indicators of Regulatory Management Systems,‖ OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 4, OECD Publishing, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/112082475604.
Karpen, U. (2016). Current situation and prospects of regulatory impact assessment (RIA) in Germany, namely in parliament.
Kirkpatrick, C. (2008). Regulatory impact assessment: Towards better regulation? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kirkpatrick, C., & Parker, D. (2004). Regulatory impact assessment and regulatory governance in developing countries. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice24(4), 333-344.
Kirkpatrick, C., Parker, D., & Zhang, Y. F. (2004). Regulatory impact assessment in developing and transition economies: a survey of current practice. Public Money & Management24(5), 291-296.
Kurniawan, T., Muslim, M. A., & Sakapurnama, E. (2018). Regulatory impact assessment and its challenges: An empirical analysis from Indonesia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences39(1), 105-108.
Lohani, B. N., Evans, J. W., Everitt, R. R., Ludwig, H., Carpenter, R. A., & Tu, S. L. (1997). Environmental impact assessment for developing countries in Asia: Volume 1-overview.
Morgenstern, R. D. (2014). Economic analyses at EPA: assessing regulatory impact. Routledge.
Nakaizumi, T. (2022). Impact assessment for developing countries: A guide for government officials and public servants. Springer Nature.
OECD, P. (1997). Regulatory impact analysis: best practices in OECD countries.
OECD. (2009). Regulatory Impact Analysis: a tool for policy coherence. OECD Publishing.
Orbach, B. (2015). A State of Inaction: Regulatory preferences, rent, and income inequality. Theoretical Inquiries in Law16(1), 45-68.
Petak, Z. (2015). Evidence-based policy making and the implementation of regulatory impact assessment in Croatia. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, (2), 147-162.
Robinson, L. A., & Nriagu, J. (2008). Assessing regulatory costs and benefits. Prepared for: Nriagu, J.(ed.). Encyclopedia of Environmental Health.
Rodrigo, D. (2005). Regulatory impact analysis in OECD countries. Challenges for developing countries. Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Śliwa, R. (2022). Regulatory impact assessment–retrospect preview, purpose, consequences. Toward e-RIA.
Smith, B. W. (2015). Regulation and the risk of inaction. Autonomes Fahren: Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte, 593-609.
Staronova, K. (2016). Regulatory impact assessment in Slovakia: performance and procedural reform. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal34(3), 214-227.
Steunenberg, B. )1992(. Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Regulatory Policy-Making. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 8(3): 673–94.
Tombs, S. (2015). Regulatory inaction? Regulation without enforcement. In social protection after the crisis (pp. 137-180). Policy Press.