Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies

Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies

The Interplay between “Politics” and “Public Policies”: An Opportunity for Progress or a Challenge to Distort Justice?

Editor-in-Chief Lecture

Author
Hassan DanaeeFard
Professor at Public Administration Department, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jipas.2024.212424
Abstract
The interplay between politics and public policy significantly influences governance and societal progress, particularly in Iran. Politics, encompassing power dynamics and ideologies, shapes public policymaking, which serves as a tool to address societal issues. Understanding this relationship is vital for advancing policymaking knowledge. This paper explores the conceptual distinction between politics, rooted in political science, and public policy, studied in policy analysis. It critiques ambiguous terms like "public policy politics" and "political policy," suggesting clearer alternatives such as "public policymaking politics" to enhance understanding. The study identifies key challenges in this interaction, including short-term political interests, inequality in policy implementation, and populism, all of which can distort justice and undermine public good. Despite these challenges, the paper highlights the potential for positive outcomes through increased transparency, accountability, and collaboration among political actors, fostering a more equitable policymaking process. Ultimately, while politics can negatively impact policy, it also provides an opportunity to create just, evidence-based, and sustainable public policies. By addressing political influences constructively, policymakers can ensure governance prioritizes fairness and long-term societal benefit over political expediency. This analysis underscores the dual nature of politics in shaping public policy—both as a challenge to justice and a potential catalyst for progress.
Keywords
Politics
Public Policy
Politics of Public Policy
Justice
دانائی‌فرد، حسن (1395). فهم شکل‌گیری خط‌مشی‌های رفع تکلیفی در کشور: پردازش مفهومی، پیش‌آیندها و پس‌آیندها. سیاست علم و فناوری، سال 8 شماره 2، 96-79.
دانائی‌فرد، حسن (1399). چارچوبی برای تحلیل کشورداری. پژوهش‌های مدیریت منابع سازمانی، سال 10، شماره 3، 12-1.
دانائی‌فرد، حسن (1401). سرنوشت خط‌مشی عمومی در فرآیند اجرا: تحلیل تعامل اراده سیاسی-ظرفیت اداری. مطالعات مدیریت دولتی ایران، سال 4، شماره4.  الف-ه.
دانائی‌فرد، حسن، شول, حسین، آذر، عادل (1391). طراحی چارچوبی برای پیشنهادیه خط‌مشی عمومی: پژوهش ترکیبی. مجلس و راهبرد، سال 18، شماره 68، 32-2.‎
دانگ، لیشنگ (1397). نظریه‌های اداره امور عمومی: عقلانیت ابزاری و ارزشی. ترجمه حسن دانائی‌فرد. تهران: نشر مهربان.
میری، محسن، دانائی‌فرد، حسن (1395). تبیین چگونگی شکل گیری نزدیک‌بینی سیاستی در نظام خط‌مشی‌گذاری ایران با تاکید بر خط‌مشی های حوزه جمعیت. مطالعات راهبردی بسیج، سال 19، شماره 73، 172-143.  
Bacchi, C. (1999). Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. London: SAGE Publications.
Ball, S. J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol: Policy Press.
Ball, S. J. (2012). Global education inc: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. London: Routledge.
Birkland, T. A. (2019). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. New York: Routledge.
Birkland, T. A. (2020). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. New York: Routledge.
Burney, R. (2013). Politics and the policy process. London: Routledge.
Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Danaeefard, H. (2017). "The getting rid of" public policies in Iran: Conceptual foundations, characteristics, antecedents, and consequences. Science and Technology Policy, 9(34), 79-98. (in Persian)
Danaeefard, H. (2020). A Framework for Analyzing Governance. Organizational Resources Management Researches, 10(3), 12-1. (in Persian)
Danaeefard, H. (2022). The Fate of Public Policies after Proclamation: An Analysis of the Interaction of Political Will and Administrative Capacity. Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies, 4(4), pp. A-E. (in Persian)
Danaeefard, H., Shoul, H., & Azar, A. (2012). Designing a Framework for Public Policy Proposals: A Mixed-Methods Research. Majles and Strategy, 18(68), 32-2. (in Persian)
Edwards, A., Hill, M., & Fischer, F. (2024). Theories of the policy process. New York: Routledge.
Fischer, F., & Miller, G. (2017). Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Greer, S. L., King, E. J., Massard da Fonseca, E., & Peralta-Santos, A. (2021). Coronavirus politics: The comparative politics and policy of COVID-19. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Hill, M. (2003). The policy process: A reader. Harlow. England: Pearson Education.
Jones, B. D. (1994). Reconceiving decision-making in democratic politics: Attention, choice, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
McConnell, A., & ’t Hart, P. (2019). In action and inaction: The failure and the success of public policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(5), 683–702.
Miri, M., & Danaeefard, H. (2016). Explaining the Formation of Policy Myopia in Iran's Policy System with Emphasis on Population Policies. Strategic Studies of Basij, 19(73), 172-143. (in Persian)
Patel, K. K., & Rushefsky, M. E. (2019). Health care politics and policy in America. New York: Routledge.
Peters, B. G. (2018). Advanced introduction to public policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rochefort, D. A. (1994). Problem definition and the policy process. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Rosenbaum, A. (2016). Policy analysis in the United States. Bristol: Policy Press.
Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Schick, A. (2008). The federal budget: Politics, policy, process. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Stone, D. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Sundquist, J. L. (2010). The decline and resurgence of Congress. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Receive Date 20 April 2024