Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies

Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies

A Dimensional Analysis of the Phenomenon of Managers’ Necessary Evils in the Decision Making of Managers in a Public Organization

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Master of Public Administration, Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences & Economy, Vali-e-Asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences & Economy, Vali-e-Asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran.
10.22034/jipas.2026.518274.1796
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to explore the fundamental dimensions involved in the occurrence of necessary evils by managers in an Iranian public organization. Necessary evils are defined as work tasks in which individuals are inevitably required, as part of their professional role, to inflict harm on another person to achieve a greater good or objective. Given the significant research gap in the Iranian management literature regarding this concept, as well as the cultural, structural, and contextual distinctions of Iranian public organizations, this study sought to identify the dimensions, conditions, processes, and consequences of necessary evils within this specific context.
Methodology: This research employed a grounded theory strategy utilizing a dimensional analysis design. The spatial scope of the study was Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan as a public organization, and the participants were its managers, who were selected based on theoretical sampling. Adhering to the principle of theoretical saturation, 20 managers with management experience ranging from 1 to 16 years and work experience from 10 to 35 years participated in the study. Data were collected through open and in-depth interviews. Data analysis was conducted in three stages: dimensionalizing, differentiation, and integration/reintegration. To ensure the credibility, dependability, transferability, and confirmability of the research, strategies such as peer debriefing, colleague review, and simultaneous participant involvement in data analysis and interpretation were employed.
Findings: Data analysis led to the identification of 42 characteristics organized into 13 dimensions. The explanatory matrix containing the identified dimensions was developed as follows: "Buffering" was identified as the perspective or core dimension of the theory, representing the cognitive justification mechanism through which managers transform harm from a wrongful act into a necessary action, emphasizing the imperative to protect individuals' rights and organizational objectives. The context included "organizational objectives" (mission, macro, and operational goals) and "management functions" (planning, organizing, resource mobilization, directing, and controlling). Conditions comprised two categories of factors: "constraints" (financial, legal, and natural) and "deviations" (budgetary deviations, performance deviations, legal deviations, and natural deviations). Processes encompassed five categories of actions: disciplinary actions (from verbal warnings to dismissal), precautionary actions (regulatory and preventive), contractionary actions (cost reduction and elimination), destructive actions (demolition, permanent removal, and disposal), and emergency actions (temporary suspension and disruption). The consequences of necessary evils were identified at three levels: consequences for managers (guilt with varying degrees), consequences for the targets/witnesses of necessary evils (ranging from expressions of complaint to insults, threats, and physical confrontation), and consequences for the organization (improved productivity in the form of effectiveness and efficiency).
Conclusion: The findings revealed that managers in the studied public organization, guided by a deontological ethical perspective and motivated by the protection of organizational goals and stakeholder rights, engaged in necessary evils. By identifying the indigenous dimensions of necessary evils, this research has addressed the contextual, conceptual, and methodological gaps in the existing literature. The results suggest that one of the behavioral roots of administrative dysfunctions in the country lies in the systematic avoidance of performing necessary and painful actions, manifesting as organizational conservatism and inertia, the promotion of a "good manager" culture over an "effective manager" culture, and resistance to change at the macro level. Practical recommendations include appointing conscientious managers, public awareness-raising prior to performing necessary evils, documenting, and communicating the resulting productivity improvements, conducting management skills development programs, establishing supportive and consultative structures, and developing ethical charters based on procedural justice. Furthermore, eight research avenues are proposed for future studies, including examining necessary evils from employees' perspectives, investigating the role of personality and situational characteristics in their consequences, and exploring moderating factors influencing the reactions of targets and witnesses.
Keywords

اقبال، نازیلا؛ شریعت‌مدار، آسیه؛ و خدادادی سنگده، جواد (1401). تجارب پدیداری مبتنی بر رودربایستی در روابط زوجی زنان با صمیمیت پایین: مطالعه کیفی. فرهنگ مشاوره و روان­درمانی، 13(4)، 309-281.
زارع، رضا؛ فتحی­زاده، علیرضا؛ و بهمنی، اکبر (1397). خویشاوندسالاری سازمانی در نهادهای دولتی؛ مفهوم‌پردازی، عوامل مؤثر و پیشنهادها. مطالعات رفتار سازمانی، 7(1)، 56-31.
زارعی، بهادر، و موسوی شهیدی، سیدمهدی (1402). واکاوی نقش ژئوپلیتیک ناپایدار ایران بر اقتصاد سیاسی کشور. مجلس و راهبرد، 30(2)، 139-111.
فقیهی، ابوالحسن، واعظی، رضا، و آغاز، عسل (1389). تأملی بر تعامل بروکراسی و فرهنگ در ایران. علوم مدیریت ایران، 5(3)، 32-1.
مصدق‌راد، علی­محمد، تاجور، مریم، و طاهری، سارا (1399). تصمیم­گیری مدیران زن در سازمان­های بهداشتی و درمانی: چالش­ها و راهکارها. پژوهش­های نوین در تصمیم­گیری، 5(1)، 94-51.
واعظی، رضا (1400). نقد مدیریت دولتی و مدیریت توسعه در ایران. حکمرانی و توسعه، 1(1)، 43-31.
Andiappan, M. (2023). Causing harm but doing good: Recognizing and overcoming the burden of necessary evil enactment in healthcare service professions. Health Services Management Research, 36(2), 153-159.
Badaracco, J. L., Jr. (1997). Defining moments: When managers must choose between right. Harvard Business School Press.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364-374.
Bauman, C. W., McGraw, A. P., Bartels, D. M., & Warren, C. (2014). Revisiting external validity: Concerns about trolley problems and other sacrificial dilemmas in moral psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(9), 536-554.
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 243–267.
Beeman, W. O. (2020). Ta’ārof: Pragmatic key to Iranian social behavior. In Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 203–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Bies, R. J. (2013). The delivery of bad news in organizations: A framework for analysis. Journal of Management, 39(1), 136-162. 
Bouwens, A., Stephenson, K. A., Sabrine, E. B., Khapova, S. N., & Gorbatov, S. (2025). Negative feedback as a necessary evil: Unpacking the role of the organization's social context. Journal of Organizational Behavior. (in press). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2886
Brief, A. P., Buttram, R. T., & Dukerich, J. M. (2001). Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 471–499). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Campbell, K. S., White, C. D., & Durant, R. (2007). Necessary evils, (in)justice, and rapport management. Journal of Business Communication, 44(2), 161-185.
Caron, C. D., & Bowers, B. J. (2000). Methods and applications of dimensional analysis: A contribution to concept and knowledge development in nursing. In B. L. K. Rodgers (Ed.), Concept development in nursing: Foundations, techniques, and applications (pp. 285-319). Philadelphia: Saunders.
Carpenter, D. (2002). Groups, the media, agency waiting costs, and FDA drug approval. American Journal of Political Science, 46(July), 490-505.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130.
Darley, J. M. (1992). Social organization for the production of evil. Psychological Inquiry, 3(2), 199–218.
Darley, J. M. (1996). How organizations socialize individuals into evildoing. In D. M. Messick & A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics (pp. 13–43). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Davis, M. H. (1983). The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality, 51(2), 167-184.
Desmarais, S., & Lerner, M. J. (1994). Entitlements in close relationships: A justice motive analysis. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships (pp. 43-63). New York: Plenum Press.
Du Gay, P. (2000). Entrepreneurial governance and public management: The anti‐bureaucrats Paul du Gay. New Managerialism, New Welfare?, 69(2.1), 62-81.
Eghbal, N., Shariatmadar, A., & Khodadadi Sangdeh, J. (2023). Ru-Dar-Baysti-Based phenomenal experiences of women with low intimacy in marital relationships. Journal of Culture of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 13(4), 281-309. (in Persian)
Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665-697.
Everett, J. A. C., Faber, N. S., Savulescu, J. & Crockett, M. J. (2018). The costs of being consequentialist: Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 200-216.
Everett, J. A. C., Pizarro, D. A., & Crockett, M. J. (2016). Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 145(6), 772-787.
Faghihi, A., Vaezi, R., & Aghaz, A. (2011). Bureaucracy and culture in Iran. Iranian journal of management sciences, 5(3), 1-32. (in Persian)
Farnsworth, S. (2003). Political support in a frustrated America. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Ferguson, T. J., & Stegge, H. (1998). Measuring guilt in children: A rose by any other name still has thorns. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 19–74). San Diego: Academic Press.
Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (1998). When tough times make tough bosses: Managerial distancing as a function of layoff blame. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 79-87.
Folger, R., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2001). Fairness as a dependent variable: Why tough times can lead to bad management. In R. S. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice, vol. 2 (pp. 97–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gandolfi, F. (2009). Phases of cost cutting: Downsizing is dead; long live the downsizing phenomenon. Review of International Comparative Management, 10(5), 864-876.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 259-286.
Huang, Y.-S., Fang, X., & Liu, R. (2022). Necessary evil: A strategy to manage dysfunctional customer behavior. Journal of Services Marketing, 36(5), 741-753.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
Kim, J., & Nam, S. H. (1998). The concept and dynamics of face: Implications for organizational behavior in Asia. Organization Science, 9(4), 522-534.
Kim, S., Thibodeau, R., & Jorgensen, R. S. (2011). Shame, guilt, and depressive symptoms: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137(1), 68-96. 
Kools, S., McCarthy, M., Durham, R., & Robrecht, L. (1996). Dimensional analysis: Broadening the conception of grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 6(3), 312-330.
Kuipers, B., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., & Van der Voet, J. (2014). The management of change in public organizations: A literature review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1-20.
Latane´, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356.
Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 272–292.
Luthans, T., & Stewart, I. (1977). A General contingency theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 2(2), 181-195.
Margolis, J. D., & Molinsky, A. (2008). Navigating the bind of necessary evils: Psychological engagement and the production of interpersonally sensitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 847-872.
McCarthy, Marianne, Ruiz, E., Gale, B., Karam, C., & Moore, N. (2004). The meaning of health: perspectives of Anglo and Latino older women. Health Care for Women International, 25(10), 950-969.
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper & Row.
Molinsky, A., & Margolis, J. (2005). Necessary evils and interpersonal sensitivity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 245-268.
Mosadeghrad, A., Tajvar, M., & Taheri, S. (2020). Female managers’ decision-making in healthcare organizations: Challenges and solutions. Modern Research in Decision Making, 5(1), 51-94. (in Persian)
Noronha, E., & D’Cruz, P. (2006). A necessary evil: The experiences of managers implementing downsizing programmes. The Qualitative Report, 11(1), 88-112.
Nussbaum, M. (1988). Nature, function and capability: Aristotle on political distribution. In J. Annas, & R. H. Grimm (Eds.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy (pp. 145-184). Oxford: Clarendon.
Olsen, J. P. (2005). Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 1-24.
Richter, M., König, C. J., Geiger, M., Schieren, S., Lothschütz, J., & Zobel, Y. (2018). “Just a little respect”: Effects of a layoff agent’s actions on employees’ reactions to a dismissal notification meeting. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 741-761.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-166.
Shaw, J. B., & Barrett-Power, E. (1997). A conceptual framework for assessing organization, work group, and individual effectiveness during and after downsizing. Human Relations, 50(2), 109–127.
Squires, A. (2004). A dimensional analysis of role enactment of acute care nurses. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 36(3), 272-278.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. The Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451-478. 
Tangney, J. P. (1995). Recent advances in the empirical study of shame and guilt. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(8), 1132-1145.
Tozer, A. W. (1961). The pursuit of God. PA: Christian Publications.
Vaezi, R. (2021). Criticism of public and development administrations in Iran. Governance & Development Journal, 1(1), 31-43. (in Persian)
Vakkari, P. (2003). Task-based information searching. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 413-464.
Van Halem, S., van Roekel, E., & Denissen, J. (2024). Understanding the dynamics of hedonic and eudaimonic motives on daily well-being: Insights from experience sampling data. Journal of Happiness Studies, 25,107.
Walzer, M. (1973). Political action: The problem of dirty hands. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2(2), 160-180.
Yu, X., & Zheng, H. (2023) An overview of research on discursive legitimation. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11, 112-127.
Zare, R., Fathyzadeh, A., & Bahmani, A. (2018). Organizational nepotism in public organizations, conceptualization, effective factors, and consequences. Organizational Behavior Studies Quarterely, 7(1), 31-56. (in Persian)
Zarei, B., & Mousavi Shahidi, S. M. (2023). Analysis of unstable geopolitics role in the political economy of Iran. Majles and Rahbord, 30(2), 111-139. (in Persian)

  • Receive Date 21 April 2025
  • Revise Date 15 December 2025
  • Accept Date 05 January 2026