Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies

Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies

A Policy-Making Model for the Formation of Effective Engagement Between Unions and Governance Actors

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Abbas Monavvarian 1
Ali Reza Tajbar 2
1 Professor, Department of Public Policy and Administration, School of Public Administration and Organizational Sciences, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 PhD Student of Public Administration, Decision Making & Public Policy, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
10.22034/jipas.2024.349330.1430
Abstract
Purpose: Unions act as intermediaries and mediators between their members and governance actors and can assume a central role in policy formulation within their respective professional domains. These unions are capable of engaging in all three arenas of legislation, implementation, and oversight and, by aligning with the government’s overarching policies, can become the leading authority within their field. In today’s context, unilateral policy development and implementation by the state, without involving stakeholders, is—if not entirely impossible—ineffective and inefficient. Therefore, the manner in which unions interact within the political and economic landscape plays a crucial role in determining the effectiveness and efficiency of the formulated policies. The present study seeks to examine the factors contributing to ineffective interactions between unions and other governance actors and to propose strategies for establishing effective engagements between them.
Methodology: This study employs a qualitative approach using the grounded theory methodology (Glaser’s emergent strategy). Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 27 experts associated with unions and governance institutions. The collected data were analyzed through open, axial, and theoretical coding. Subsequently, by utilizing secondary data and relevant literature, a conceptual model of the research was developed.
Findings: The findings indicate that several factors contribute to the ineffective interaction between unions and other governance actors. Legal and regulatory factors include the inefficiency of existing laws and regulations, their outdated and fragmented nature, and the absence of proper enforcement mechanisms. Structural factors involve organizational and financial weaknesses of unions, their excessive multiplicity, fragile internal structures, and the lack of comprehensive mandates. Member-related factors include inactivity, limited participation, lack of awareness regarding available capacities, and excessive expectations. Political and economic contingencies include the absence of a clear governmental strategy toward unions and distrust of the private sector. Moreover, cultural and social factors—such as prevailing cultural challenges and suspicion toward unions—as well as historical fluctuations in their development, influence these relationships. These conditions lead to inefficiencies in the policy-making process, inadequate utilization of the unions’ potential, and the emergence of socio-economic distortions. To overcome these challenges, the study proposes several strategies: revising and consolidating laws and regulations with the participation of unions; strengthening the organizational and financial capacities of unions; merging and forming stronger institutions; reconsidering economic policies; promoting cultural development; leveraging media and academic resources; building trust; and redefining the role of unions in society and the policy-making process. The proposed model emphasizes that unions can play active roles throughout all stages of the policy-making cycle, including the identification and articulation of public issues, participation in policy formulation, involvement in implementation, and engagement in policy evaluation. Achieving this requires a supportive legal framework, robust and efficient structures, and the establishment of trust-based and interactive relationships with other governance actors.
Conclusion: The overall conclusion of the study suggests that effective interaction between unions and governance actors facilitates the optimal use of capacities, reduces deficiencies in the policy-making process, and helps mitigate certain socio-economic challenges. The study further recommends the development of a national strategic document to strengthen the position of unions and institutionalize their role in governance. One of the study’s limitations is the lack of participation by certain key institutions—particularly the judiciary—which may be addressed in future research.
Keywords
Public Policy
Effective Relationship
Governance Actors
Union
استراوس، انسلم؛ و کربین، جولیت (1990). اصول روش پژوهش کیفی: نظریه مبنایی، رویه‌ها و شیوه‌ها. ترجمه بیوک محمدی. 1390. تهران: پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی.
الوانی، سید مهدی (1388). حکمرانی خوب، شبکه‌ای از کنشگران جامعه مدنی. مجله مدیریت توسعه و تحول، 1(1)، 5-1.
الوانی، سید مهدی؛ و شریف‌زاده، فتاح (1394). فرایند خط‌مشی‌گذاری عمومی. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
پورعزت، علی اصغر (1395). مبانی مدیریت دولتی. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی (سمت).
پورعزت، علی اصغر؛ و هاشمی کاسوایی، مینا سادات. (1396). مسئله عمومی: چالش آغازین خط‌مشی‌گذاری دولتی. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
حاجیان‌پور، حمید؛ و تاجداری، زینب. (1392). جایگاه اصناف در نظام سیاسی، اقتصادی و اجتماعی ایران از دوران صفویه تا انقلاب اسلامی. فصلنامه پارسه، 20(پاییز)، 61-35.
دانایی‌فرد، حسن؛ و امامی، سیدمجتبی (1386). استراتژی‌های پژوهش کیفی: تأملی بر نظریه داده‌بنیاد. اندیشه مدیریت، 1(2)،97-69.
سردارنیا، خلیل‌اله؛ و جاهدین محمدی، ساسان (1395). سازوکارهای حقوقی تعامل اصناف با دولت و ضعف نهادمندی اتحادیه‌های صنفی در ایران. مجله مطالعات حقوقی دانشگاه شیراز، 8(1)، 83-57.
قلی‌پور، رحمت‌اله (1395). تصمیم‌گیری سازمانی و خط‌مشی‌گذاری عمومی. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی (سمت).
محمدپور، احمد (1392). روش پژوهش کیفی: ضد روش 2، مراحل و رویه‌های عملی در روش‌شناسی کیفی. تهران: انتشارات جامعه‌شناسان.
هاولت، مایکل؛ رامش، ام.؛ و پرل، آنتونی (2003). مطالعه خط‌مشی عمومی. ترجمه عباس منوریان و ابراهیم گلشن. 1395. تهران: کتاب مهربان.
Alvani, S. M. (2009). Good governance, a network of civil society actors. Journal of Development and Transformation Management, 1(1), 1–5. (in Persian)
Alvani, S. M., & Sharifzadeh, F. (2015). Public Policy Making Process. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba’i University Press. (in Persian)
Coston, J. M. (1998). A Model and Typology of Government-NGO Relationships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(3), 358–382.
Danaeefard, H., & Emami, S. M. (2007). Qualitative Research Strategies: Reflections on Grounded Theory. Management Thought, 1(2), 69–97. (in Persian)
Gholipour, R. (2016). Organizational Decision-Making and Public Policy-Making. Tehran: SAMT (Organization for Researching and Compiling University Textbooks in the Humanities). (in Persian)
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling Grounded Theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(2), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-5.2.607
Glaser, B. G. (2005). The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Hajianpour, H., & Tajdari, Z. (2013). The Position of Guilds in Iran’s Political, Economic, And Social System from the Safavid Era to the Islamic Revolution. Parseh Quarterly, 20(Autumn), 35–61. (In Persian)
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2003). Studying Public Policy (A. Monavarian & E. Golshan, Trans.). (2016). Tehran: Mehraban Book. (In Persian)
Kailah, S. (2019). Distinguishing Between the Types of Grounded Theory: Classical, Interpretive, And Constructivist. Journal For Social Thought, 3(1), 1–17. Https://Ojs.Lib.Uwo.Ca/Index.Php/Jst/Article/View/5684
Korkut, U. (2007). Participatory Policy-Making, Participatory Civil Society: A Key for Dissolving Elite Rule in New Democracies in the Era of Globalization. World Futures: The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 63(5–6), 340–352.
Mohammadpour, A. (2013). Qualitative Research Method: Anti-Method 2, Stages and Practical Procedures in Qualitative Methodology. Tehran: Jameeshenasan Publishers. (In Persian)
Pourazat, A. A. (2016). Fundamentals Of Public Administration. Tehran: Samt (Organization for Researching and Compiling University Textbooks in the Humanities). (In Persian)
Pourazat, A. A., & Hashemi Kasvaei, M. S. (2017). Public Issue: The Initial Challenge of Public Policy-Making. Tehran: University Of Tehran Press. (In Persian)
Sardarnia, Kh., & Jahedin mohammadi, S. (2016). Legal Mechanisms of Interaction Between Guilds and the Government and the Institutional Weakness of Trade Unions in Iran. Journal of Legal Studies of Shiraz University, 8(1), 57–83. (In Persian)
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics Of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (B. Mohammadi, Trans.). (2014). Tehran: Institute For Humanities and Cultural Studies. (In Persian)

  • Receive Date 03 July 2024
  • Revise Date 16 March 2024
  • Accept Date 23 September 2024