طراحی مدل نظامات کارکرد محور و ارزش‌مدار سازمان‌های نهادی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، دانشکدة مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی دانشگاه جامع امام حسین(ع)، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت استراتژیک، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

10.22034/jipas.2020.209548.1056

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، ارائۀ الگوی تدوین نظامات سازمان است. برای انجام این پژوهش، یک سازمان ارزش‌مدار و نظامی انتخاب شده و از طریق روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی، مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است. ابتدا ویژگی‌های نظامات مطلوب، از منظر مدیران ارشد سازمان تعیین شد و سپس از طریق روش نمونه‌گیری قضاوتی و گلوله برفی، 12 نفر از خبرگان سازمانی و دانشگاهی انتخاب و طیّ مصاحبه‌ای، از آنها خواسته شد تا به تشریح مبانی طراحی نظامات، بر مبنای ویژگی‌های استخراج‌شده نظامات بپردازند. مصاحبه‌ها بر مبنای روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند و در نهایت، 173 کد، 12 مقوله و 3 مضمون استخراج شدند که اکوسیستم نظامات را تشکیل می‌دهند. بر مبنای یافته‌های پژوهش، تعامل و هم‌افزایی در سه بُعد محیطی، شکلی و محتوایی نظامات که در قالب 3 مضمون استخراج شدند، سبب توسعۀ کارکرد نظامات و تنیدگی ارزش‌ها در تار و پود آنها می‌‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a Functional Systems Model of Value-based Organizations

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Miri 1
  • Hamid Reza Tafaghodi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Management and Strategic Planning Faculty of Imam Hossein Comprehensive University, Tehran, Iran
2 PhD Student of Strategic Management, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to present a model for formulating organizational systems. For this research, a value-based, military organization was selected and studied using qualitative Content Analysis Method. At the first step, the characteristics of desirable systems were determined from the perspective of the senior executives of the organization. Next, 12 professional and academic experts were selected and interviewed using judgmental and snowball sampling. They were asked to describe the basics of system design based on their characteristics. Interviews were analyzed based on qualitative Content Analysis Method. Finally, 173 codes, 12 categories, and 3 themes were extracted which altogether form the ecosystem of systems. Based on the research findings, the interaction and synergy between the three environmental, formalistic, and thematic dimensions of the systems, which extracted as three main themes, improve the systems’ functionality and add value to them.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • system design
  • System
  • function
  • Value-Based
Abdelkafi, N. Tauscher, K. (2015). Business models for sustainability from a system dynamics perspective. Organization & Environment, 44(1), 669-678.
Armenakis, A. Harris, S. G. (2009). Reflections: Our journey in organizational change research and practice. Journal of Change Management, 9(1), 127-142.
Bakker, J.I. (2019). Grounded theory methodology and grounded theory method: Introduction to the special issue. Sociological Focus, 52(2), 91-106.
Cocca, P. Alberti, M. (2010). A framework to assess performance measurement systems in smes. International Journal of Production Performance Management. 59(2), 186–200.
Domingues, P., Sampaio, P. & Arezes, P.M. (2016). Integrated management systems assessment: A maturity model proposal. Journal of Clear Production, 124(2), 164-174.
Donada, C., Mothe, C., Nogatchewsky, G. & Campos-Ribeiro, G. (2019). The respective effects of virtues and inter-organizational management control systems on relationship quality and performance: Virtues win. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(1), 211-228.
Garengo, P. Sharma, M.K. (2014). Performance measurement system contingency factors: A cross analysis of Italian and Indian smes. Production, Plan and Control, 25(3), 220–240.
Gawer, A. Cusumano, M.A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 31(3), 417-433.
Hughes, B.P. Anund, A. Falkmer, T. (2015). System theory and safety models in Swedish, uk, dutch and Australian soad safety strategies. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 74(2), 271-278.
Jardioui, M. Garengo, P. Alami, S. (2017). The impact of organizational culture on performance measurement system design, implementation and use: Evidence from Moroccan smes. International Federation for Information Processing, 553-559.
Latham, J. R. & J. Vinyard. (2012). Organization diagnosis, design, and transformation: a baldrige user’s guide. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Morgeson, F., Mitchell, T. & Liu, D. (2015). Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 1-35.
Natow, R.S. (2019). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160-173.
Papantonopoulos, S. (2004). How system designers think: A study of design thinking in human factors engineering. Ergonomics, 47(14), 1528-1548.
Puche, J., Ponte, B. Costas, J., Pino, R. & de la Fuente, D. (2016). Systemic approach to supply Chain management through the viable system model and the theory of Constraints. Production Planning & Control, 27(5), 421-430.
Ross, D.A., Jon, P.W. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44(2), 669-678.
Skaržauskiene, A. (2008). Theoretical insights to leadership based on systems thinking principles. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 48(3), 105-120.
Smith, Ph., Spencer, A., Billings, Ch. (2007). Strategies for designing distributed systems: Case studies in the design of an air traffic management system. Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory, 9(1), 39-49.
Tsujimoto, M., Kajikawa, Y., Tomita, J. & Matsumoto, Y. (2018). A review of the ecosystem concept — towards coherent ecosystem design. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 136(4), 49-58.
Valdecasas, A, G., Correas, A, M., Guerrero, C., Juez J .(2009). Understanding complex systems:Lessons from auzoux’s and von hagens’s anatomical. Journal of Biosciences, 34(6), 835-843.
Verburg, R. M., Nienaber, A.-M., Searle, R. H., Weibel, A., Den Hartog, D. N., & Rupp, D. E. (2018). The role of organizational control systems in employees’ organizational trust and performance outcomes. Group & Organization Management, 43(2), 179–206.
Weshah, Gh., Manasrah, E. & Qatawneh, M. (2019). Customer relationship management systems and organizational performance: Quantitative evidence from the jordanian telecommunication industry. Journal of Marketing Communication, 25(8), 799-819.
Whittemore, R., Chase, S.K., Mandle, C.L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522-537.