حسان، رضا؛ صدیقی، امیرحسین؛ و شریفزاده، رحمان (۱۳۹۹). پردازش نظاممند قانون: مطالعه موردی قانون پیشگیری و مقابله با تقلب در تهیه آثار علمی. پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، ۳۵(۴)، ۸۹۳-۹۲۰.
حمیدیزاده، علی؛ داناییفرد، حسن؛ معافی، مهدی؛ و اخوانعلوی، سیدحسین (۱۳۹۷). پیشایندهای ظرفیت هماهنگی خطمشیهای ملی در ایران: واکاوی سهگانه سختافزاری، نرمافزاری و ذهنافزاری. سیاستگذاری عمومی، ۴(۴)، ۱۷۹-۲۰۳.
حسینپور، داود؛ الوانی، سیدمهدی؛ اصلیپور، حسین؛ و قربانی پاجی، عقیل (۱۴۰۳). ارائه چارچوبی از عوامل مؤثر بر اجرای خطمشیهای حوزه حفاظت و بهرهبرداری از جنگلهای شمال کشور. مدیریت دولتی، ۱۶(۴)، ۷۱۰-۷۴۶.
خسروی، مهدی؛ داناییفرد، حسن؛ کاظمی، سیدحسین؛ دلخواه، جلیل؛ و فروزنده، لطفالله (۱۴۰۴). واکاوی دلایل انفعال دولت در برخی از عرصههای عمومی: یک مطالعه کیفی. مدیریت دولتی، ۱۷(۴)، ۸۳۴-۸۷۱.
شریفزاده، فتاح؛ کاظمیان، غلامرضا؛ حسینپور، داود؛ و قیطاسیوند، فاطمه (۱۳۹۹). طراحی الگوی تدوین خطمشی عمومی با رویکرد حکمرانی شبکهای: مورد مطالعه حملونقل عمومی شهر تهران. سیاستگذاری عمومی، ۶(۱)، ۸۹-۱۱۳.
شیخحسنی، علی؛ فقیهی، ابوالحسن؛ و دانشفرد، کرمالله (۱۳۹۷). تحلیل خطمشیگذاری مالیاتی در نظام مالیات بر ارزش افزوده ایران. مدیریت دولتی، ۱۰(۱)، ۱۳۷-۱۶۰.
قربانلو، محسن؛ یوسفی امیری، مظاهر؛ و چگین، میثم (۱۴۰۴). واکاوی مفهوم آمیخته ابزار خطمشی عمومی و معیارهای طراحی آن با روش فراترکیب. مدیریت دولتی، ۱۷(۲)، ۳۷۴-۴۰۷.
کشوریانآزاد، رقیه؛ اعتباریان خوراسگانی، اکبر؛ هادی پیکانی، مهربان؛ و شاهنوشی، مجتبی (۱۴۰۱). طراحی مدل اجرای خطمشیهای قضایی در نهاد قضایی کشور. مدیریت دولتی، ۱۴(۱)، ۱۲۹-۱۶۴.
کریممیان، زهره؛ محمدی، مهدی؛ قاضینوری، سیدسپهر؛ و ذوالفقارزاده، محمدمهدی (۱۳۹۸). طبقهبندی ویژگیهای حکمرانی از طریق شبکههای خطمشی با استفاده از روش فراترکیب. مدیریت دولتی، ۱۱(۳)، ۳۷۷–۴۰۲.
یادگاری، آمنه؛ یوسفی، علی؛ و امینی، امیرمظفر (۱۳۹۷). تحلیل نهادی ساختار حکمرانی آب در حوضه زایندهرود. تحقیقات منابع آب ایران، ۱۴(۱)، ۱۸۴–۱۹۷.
Ambrose, G., Gregoire-Zawilski, M., Siddiki, S., & Oesterling, N. (2024). Understanding policy evolution using institutional grammar: Net metering policies in the United States. Policy Design and Practice, 7(2), 227–249.
Basurto, X., Kingsley, G., McQueen, K., Smith, M., & Weible, C. M. (2010). A systematic approach to institutional analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom’s grammar. Political Research Quarterly, 63(3), 523–537.
Bushouse, B. K., Schweik, C. M., Siddiki, S., Rice, D., & Wolfson, I. (2023). The institutional grammar: A method for coding institutions and its potential for advancing third sector research. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 34(1), 76–83.
Chen, S. (2024, December). Research on the optimization of domestic waste classification policy: An analysis based on the institutional grammar tool. In 2024 4th International Conference on Modern Educational Technology and Social Sciences (ICMETSS 2024) (pp. 326–332). Atlantis Press.
Deslatte, A., Helmke-Long, L., Anderies, J. M., Garcia, M., Hornberger, G. M., & Ann Koebele, E. (2022). Assessing sustainability through the Institutional Grammar of urban water systems. Policy Studies Journal, 50(2), 387–406.
Dunlop, C. A., Kamkhaji, J. C., & Radaelli, C. M. (2019). A sleeping giant awakes? The rise of the Institutional Grammar Tool (IGT) in policy research. Journal of Chinese Governance, 4(2), 163–180.
Dunlop, C. A., Kamkhaji, J. C., Radaelli, C. M., & Taffoni, G. (2021). The institutional grammar tool meets the narrative policy framework: Narrating institutional statements in consultation. European Policy Analysis, 7, 365–385.
Ebenhöh, E. (2007). Modelling rules, norms, and institutional change using the grammar of institutions. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the European Social Simulation Association (ESSA ’07), September 10–14, 2007, Toulouse, France (p. 225).
Espinosa, S. (2015). Unveiling the features of a regulatory system: The institutional grammar of tobacco legislation in Mexico. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(9), 616–631.
Filgueiras, F., Lui, L., Rosa, T. G., & Candido Ferreira, G. (2025). The institutional design of data governance in Brazil: Entropy, restrictiveness and institutional grammar. Policy Design and Practice, 8(1), 64–88.
Firdous, N., Ch, M. Z. A., & Ashraf, M. U. (2025). The politics of grammar: How morphosyntax is used to impose ideology in Pakistan’s legal and bureaucratic texts. Research Consortium Archive, 3(2), 668–679.
Frantz, C. K., & Siddiki, S. (2021). Institutional Grammar 2.0: A specification for encoding and analyzing institutional design. Public Administration, 99(2), 222–247.
Frantz, C. K., & Siddiki, S. (2022). Institutional Grammar 2.0: Conceptual foundations and general syntax. In Institutional Grammar: Foundations and Applications for Institutional Analysis (pp. 75–140). Springer International Publishing.
Frantz, C. K., & Siddiki, S. (2022). Institutional Grammar 2.0: Deep structural parsing and hybrid institutional statements. In Institutional Grammar: Foundations and Applications for Institutional Analysis (pp. 141–191). Springer International Publishing.
Frantz, C. K., & Siddiki, S. (2022). Institutional Grammar 2.0: Semantic features and analytical linkages. In Institutional Grammar: Foundations and Applications for Institutional Analysis (pp. 193–242). Springer International Publishing.
Frantz, C. K., & Siddiki, S. (2022). Motivation for a new institutional grammar. In Institutional Grammar: Foundations and Applications for Institutional Analysis (pp. 53–73). Springer International Publishing.
Frantz, C. K., & Siddiki, S. N. (2020). Institutional grammar 2.0 codebook. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.08937.
Frantz, C., & Siddiki, S. (2022). Institutional grammar: Foundations and applications for institutional analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Frantz, C., Purvis, M. K., Nowostawski, M., & Savarimuthu, B. T. R. (2013, December). (ADICO): A nested grammar of institutions. In International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 429–436). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Ghorbanloo, M., Yousefi Amiri, M., & Chegin, M. (2025). Analyzing the concept of public policy instrument mix and its design criteria using meta-synthesis. Public Administration, 17(2), 374–407. [in Persian]
Guan, Y., & Yi, H. (2024). The development process and research frontiers of institutional grammar: A systematic literature review. China Public Administration Review, 6(3), 248–270.
Hamidizadeh, A., Danaeefard, H., Mo'afi, M., & Akhavan Alavi, S.-H. (2018). Antecedents of national policy coordination capacity in Iran: A tripartite analysis of hardware, software, and mindware. Public Policy, 4(4), 179–203. [in Persian]
Hassan, R., Sedighi, A.-H., & Sharifzadeh, R. (2020). Systematic processing of law: A case study of the Law on Prevention and Combating Fraud in the Preparation of Scientific Works. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 35(4), 893–920. [in Persian]
Hosseinpour, D., Alvani, S.-M., Aslipour, H., & Ghorbani Paji, A. (2024). Presenting a framework of factors affecting the implementation of policies in the field of protection and exploitation of forests in the north of the country. Public Administration, 16(4), 710–746. [in Persian]
Keshvarian Azad, R., E'temadian Khorasgani, A., Hadi Peykani, M., & Shahnooshi, M. (2022). Designing a model for the implementation of judicial policies in the country's judicial institution. Public Administration, 14(1), 129–164. [in Persian]
Khosravi, M., Danaeefard, H., Kazemi, S.-H., Delkhah, J., & Forouzandeh, L. (2025). Analyzing the reasons for government passivity in some public domains: A qualitative study. Public Administration, 17(4), 834–871. [in Persian]
Lai, C. H., & Zhao, J. (2023). Decomposing the institutional structure of interstate river basins using institutional grammar and institutional analysis and development framework. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 149(7), 04023022.
Lien, A. M. (2020). The institutional grammar tool in policy analysis and applications to resilience and robustness research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 44, 1–5.
Lien, A. M., Schlager, E., & Lona, A. (2018). Using institutional grammar to improve understanding of the form and function of payment for ecosystem services programs. Ecosystem Services, 31, 21–31.
McKenna, D. (n.d.). Strategies, norms and rules: Applying the grammar of institutions to local politics.
Meng, Q., & Wei, B. (2025). Characteristics of policy regulation in public data authorized operation: An analysis based on the institutional grammar tool. China Public Administration Review, 7(1), 33–55.
Mirzaei, A., & Theesfeld, I. (2025). Diving deep into legal layers: institutional grammar's insight into Iran's groundwater laws. Water Policy, 27(4), 477-500.
Pacheco-Vega, R. (2019). Institutional analysis with the institutional grammar. Policy Studies Journal.
Pérez-Ibarra, I., Tenza-Peral, A., Soler-Navarro, D., Iglesia, D. A. D. L., & Garate-Marín, C. (2023). Evolution and diversity of institutions: Using institutional grammar to analyze governance changes in traditional crop-livestock systems. International Review of Public Policy, 5(5:2), 161–179.
Pieper, L., Virgüez, S., Schlager, E., & Schweik, C. (2023). The use of the institutional grammar 1.0 for institutional analysis: A literature review. International Journal of the Commons, 17(1), 256–270.
Pîndaru, L. C., Niță, A., Niculae, I. M., & Rozylowicz, L. (2024). Institutional Grammar Tool for Policy Analysis: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning, 15(2), 97.
Rice, D., Siddiki, S., Frey, S., Kwon, J. H., & Sawyer, A. (2021). Machine coding of policy texts with the Institutional Grammar. Public Administration, 99(2), 248–262.
Roditis, M. L., Wang, D., Glantz, S. A., & Fallin, A. (2015). Evaluating California campus tobacco policies using the American College Health Association guidelines and the institutional grammar tool. Journal of American College Health, 63(1), 57–67.
Schluter, A., & Theesfeld, I. (2008). The grammar of institutions: The challenge to distinguish between norms and rules. In Colloquium Series of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Bloomington, IN.
Schlüter, A., & Theesfeld, I. (2010). The grammar of institutions: The challenge of distinguishing between strategies, norms, and rules. Rationality and Society, 22(4), 445–475.
Sharifzadeh, F., Kazemian, G., Hosseinpour, D., & Gheitasi Vand, F. (2020). Designing a public policy formulation model with a network governance approach: The case of public transportation in Tehran. Public Policy, 6(1), 89–113. [in Persian]
Sheikh Hassani, A., Faghihi, A., & Daneshfard, K. (2018). Analysis of tax policymaking in Iran's value-added tax system. Public Administration, 10(1), 137–160. [in Persian]
Siddiki, S. (2013). Policies and perceptions: Using the Institutional Grammar Tool to assess policy design, appropriateness, and coerciveness.
Siddiki, S., & Frantz, C. (2022). The institutional grammar in policy process research. Policy Studies Journal, 50(2), 299–314.
Siddiki, S., & Frantz, C. K. (2024). Understanding regulation using the Institutional Grammar 2.0. Regulation & Governance, 18(3), 674–687.
Siddiki, S., Basurto, X., & Weible, C. (2010). Comparing formal and informal institutions with the institutional grammar tool. Access at: https://scholarworks.indianapolis.iu.edu/items/f2383472-5905-4dd4-aee1-5c536069ad93.
Siddiki, S., Basurto, X., & Weible, C. M. (2012). Using the institutional grammar tool to understand regulatory compliance: The case of Colorado aquaculture. Regulation & Governance, 6(2), 167–188.
Siddiki, S., Brady, U., & Frantz, C. K. (2023). The institutional grammar: Evolving directions in current research. International Review of Public Policy, 5(5:2), 121–136.
Siddiki, S., Heikkila, T., Weible, C. M., Pacheco-Vega, R., Carter, D., Curley, C., ... & Bennett, A. (2022). Institutional analysis with the institutional grammar. Policy Studies Journal, 50(2), 315–339.
Siddiki, S., Weible, C. M., Basurto, X., & Calanni, J. (2011). Dissecting policy designs: An application of the institutional grammar tool. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 79–103.
Vannoni, M. (2022). A political economy approach to the grammar of institutions: Theory and methods. Policy Studies Journal, 50(2), 453–471.
Yang, C., & Jia, W. (2025). How policy designs influence the innovation performance of China's emergency industry: An institutional grammar perspective. Kybernetes, 54(2), 1199–1218.