سنخ‌شناسی تعارض منافع کارگزاران دولتی: پهنه‌کاوی مطالعات تعارض منافع در بخش دولتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

10.22034/jipas.2022.315287.1289

چکیده

تعارض منافع مرکز ثقل بسیاری از جرائم اقتصادی است. برای مدیریت تعارض منافع، نخستین قدم ارائه تعریف دقیقی از این مفهوم است. پژوهش حاضر با بهره جستن از روش پهنه‌کاوی سعی بر آن دارد تا تعاریف متعدد مطالعات صورت گرفته در این حوزه را ترکیب کند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها مراجعه به مطالعات تعارض منافع در حرفه مدیریت دولتی بوده است. ابزار تحلیل داده‌ها در وهله اول تعیین شاخص‌های کیفی برای ارزیابی مطالعات و در وهله دوم تحلیل محتوای جهت‌دار بوده است. یافته‌های پژوهش بیانگر وجود چهار گونه تعارض منافع برای یک کارگزار دولتی است: منفعت مالی کارگزار دولتی، منفعت غیرمالی کارگزار دولتی، منفعت مالی اطرافیان و منفعت غیرمالی اطرافیان. مادامی که صرفاً به منفعت مالی کارگزار دولتی توجه شود، بررسی سایر گونه‌های ذکرشده در سیستم قانون‌گذاری، اصلاحات و نظارت‌های ساختاری مورد غفلت قرار می‌گیرد. در صورتی که سیستم قانون‌گذاری یا اصلاحات و نظارت ساختاری به موقعیت‌های مالی کارگزار دولتی توجه کند، بیش از نیمی از موقعیت‌های تعارض منافع کارگزار دولتی به دست فراموشی سپرده می‌شود. مدیریت تعارض منافع زمانی در ریل‌گذاری مناسب قرار می‌گیرد که تعریف جامع و مانعی از آن ارائه گردد؛ مسئله‌ای که هسته مرکزی پژوهش حاضر را شکل داده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Typology of Public Sector Agent Conflict of Interest: Scoping Review of Conflict of Interest Studies in Public Sector

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeed Jafari Nia 1
  • Hassan Abedi Jafari 2
  • Yousef Vakili 1
  • Mostafa Ranjbar Kaboutarkhani 3
1 Assistant Professor, Public Administration Department, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Public Administration Department, Management Faculty, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
3 PhD Candidate at Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Conflicts of interest have been at the heart of many recent economic crimes. The first step in the management of conflict of interest is to provide a clear and exact definition of the term. This study attempts to coalesce various definitions of the term utilizing scoping review methodology.  The data collection tool was a reference to studies conducted based on the conflict of interest in the field of public administration. For data analysis, the qualitative indicators were identified in order to examine the conducted studies. The study identifies four main types of conflict of interest for public sector agents: financial interest of a public sector agent, non-financial interest of a public sector agent, financial interest of relatives, and non-financial interest of relatives. As long as the financial interest of the government agent is the focal point, the analysis of other types of conflict of interest in legislation system, reforms, and structural observation is overlooked. If legislative system and structural reforms limit themselves to the financial interest of the government agent, more than half of the conflict of interest cases of the government agent will be neglected. The management of conflict of interest will be on a right track once a comprehensive definition of the term is presented, a feature which forms the main concern of this paper.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Conflict of Interest
  • Typology
  • Scoping Review
  • Public Sector Officials

مراجع

ایمان، محمدتقی، نوشادی، محمودرضا (1390). تحلیل محتوای کیفی. فصلنامه عیار پژوهش در علوم انسانی. سال 3، شماره 2، 44-15.
Barry, M. J., Chan, E., Moulton, B., Sah, S., Simmons, M. B., & Braddock, C. (2013). Disclosing conflicts of interest in patient decision aids. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(2), 1-6.
Bazerman, M. H., Moore, D. A., Tetlock, P. E., & Tanlu, L. (2006). Reports of solving the conflicts of interest in auditing are highly exaggerated. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 43-49.
Bélisle-Pipon, J. C., Ringuette, L., Cloutier, A. I., Doudenkova, V., & Williams-Jones, B. (2018). Conflicts of interest and the (in) dependence of experts advising government on immunization policies. Vaccine, 36(49), 7439-7444.
Bergström, L. (1970). What is a Conflict of Interest?. Journal of Peace Research, 7(3), 197-217.
Bero, L. A., & Grundy, Q. (2016). Why having a (nonfinancial) interest is not a conflict of interest. PLoS biology, 14(12), e2001221.
Boatright, J. R. (1992). Conflict of interest: An agency analysis. The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics, 3(4) 187-203.
Boyce, G., & Davids, C. (2008) Social accountability, ethics, and the public interest: Dealing with conflict of interest in the public sector. International Workshop on Social Audit, Social Accounting and Accountability, 14(2), 1-41.
Boyce, G., & Davids, C. (2009). Conflict of interest in policing and the public sector: Ethics, integrity and social accountability. Public Management Review, 11(5), 601-640.
Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., & Moore, D. A. (2005). The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. The Journal of Legal Studies, 34(1), 1-25.
Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., & Moore, D. A. (2011). When sunlight fails to disinfect: Understanding the perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5), 836-857.
Calabrò, A., & Torchia, M. (2011). Conflicts of interest and governance mechanisms in Italian local public utilities. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(7), 447-460.
Carson, T. L. (1994). Conflicts of interest. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(5), 387-404.
Chapman, B. C. (2014). Conflict of Interest and Corruption in the States. Doctoral dissertation, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Carbondale.
Chugh, D., Bazerman, M. H., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy, 17(1), 74-95.
Clark, K. (2011). Ethics, Employees and Contractors: Financial Conflicts In and Out of Government. Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper, 62(5). 961-1004.
Cohen, E. D. (2001). Counselors who teach and teachers who counsel. Conflict of Interest in the Professions, 159.
Davis, M., & Stark, A. (Eds.). (2001). Conflict of interest in the professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Davids, C. (2004). Police Misconduct, Regulation and Accountability: Conflict of Interest Complaints Against Victoria Police Officers 1988-1998. Doctoral dissertation University of New South Wales.
Davids, C. (2006). Conflict of interest and the private lives of police officers: friendships, civic and political activities. Journal of policing, intelligence and counter terrorism, 1(1), 14-35.
Demski, J. S. (2003). Corporate conflicts of interest. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(2), 51-72.
Di Carlo, E., & Testarmata, S. (2011). Defining directors’ conflict of interests in code of ethics. Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition, 7(1-1), 125-139.
Di Carlo, E. (2013). How much is really known about the meaning of the term “Conflict of Interest”?. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(12), 884-896.
Geis, G., Mobley, A., & Shichor, D. (1999). Private prisons, criminological research, and conflict of interest: A case study. Crime & Delinquency, 45(3), 372-388.
Grupe, F. (2003). Information systems professionals and conflict of interest. Information management & computer security. 11(1), 28-32.
Jesson, J., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. Sage.
Kanyane, M. H. (2005). Conflict of interest in South Africa: A comparative case study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria.
Kassirer, J. P. (2005). Physicians’ financial ties with the pharmaceutical industry a critical element of a formidable marketing network. Conflicts of Interest: Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy, 133.
Komesaroff, P. A., Kerridge, I., & Lipworth, W. (2019). Conflicts of interest: new thinking, new processes. Internal medicine journal, 49(5), 574-577.
Lankester, T. (2007, August). Conflict of Interest: A historical and comparative perspective. In Conference Paper, ABD/OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative for Asia-Pacific 5th Regional Seminar: Conflict of Interest—A Fundamental Anticorruption Concept (5-6).
Latham, S. R. (2001). Conflict of interest in medical practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Leys, W. A. (1961). Ethics, Social Science, and: Conflict of Interest. American Behavioral Scientist, 5(3), 3-7.
Loewenstein, G., Cain, D. M., & Sah, S. (2011). The limits of transparency: Pitfalls and potential of disclosing conflicts of interest. American Economic Review, 101(3), 423-28.
Luebke, N. R. (1987). Conflict of interest as a moral category. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 6(1), 66-81.
Luebke, N. R. (2001). Conflict of Interest in Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Mayes, C., Williams, J., Kerridge, I., & Lipworth, W. (2017). Scientism, conflicts of interest, and the marginalization of ethics in medical education. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24(5), 939-944.
Miller, D. T. (2001). The norm of self-interest. In The next phase of business ethics: Integrating psychology and ethics. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Moore, D. A., Loewenstein, G., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2003). Auditor independence, conflict of interest, and the unconscious intrusion of bias. Division of Research, Boston: Harvard Business School.
Moore, D. A., Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., & Bazerman, M. H. (Eds.). (2005). Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy. Cambridge University Press.
Moore, D. A., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). Conflict of interest and the intrusion of bias. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(1), 37-53.
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology, 18(1), 1-7.
OECD (2003). Managing conflict of interest in the public service: OECD guidelines and Country Experiences. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD (2005). Managing conflict of interest in the public sector: A toolkit.
Orts, E. W. (2001). Conflict of interest on corporate boards. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Radon, J., & Thaler, J. (2005). Resolving conflicts of interest in state‐owned enterprises. International Social Science Journal, 15(57), 11-20.
Rosenson, B. (2000). Legislative ethics regulation in the American states: explaining conflict of interest legislation, 1954-1996. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Sah, S. (2012). Conflicts of interest and your physician: psychological processes that cause unexpected changes in behavior. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 40(3), 482-487.
Sah, S., Fagerlin, A., & Ubel, P. (2016). Effect of physician disclosure of specialty bias on patient trust and treatment choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(27), 7465-7469.
Sah, S., Loewenstein, G., & Cain, D. (2018). Insinuation anxiety: Concern that advice rejection will signal distrust after conflict of interest disclosures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(7), 1099-1112.
Sah, S. (2019). Understanding the (perverse) effects of disclosing conflicts of interest: A direct replication study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 18(75), 1-14.
Stark, A. (1992). Public sector conflict of interest at the federal level in Canada and the US: differences in understanding and approach. Public Administration Review, 52(5), 427-437.
Stark, A. (2001). Comparing conflict of interest across the professions. Conflict of Interest in the Professions, 335-52.
Williams-Jones., Bryn (2011) Beyond a Pejorative Understanding of Conflict of Interest, The American Journal of Bioethics, 11(1), 1-2.
Zibold, F. (2013). Conflicts of interest in public administration. European Parliamentary Research Service. 12(2), 1-5.

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 03 آذر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 28 بهمن 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 28 اسفند 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار